An intriguing recent post of the
President of the European Commission on the State of the Union: Barroso stated
that "Europe needs a new direction, it can not be based on old ideas - Europe needs new thinking. Let’s not be afraid of the words:
we will need to move towards a federation of nation states". The
main idea is greater European integration. In addition it also covers the
‘banking union’, ‘fiscal union’ and the ‘political union’.
Interesting as well are the ideas
presented by Commissioner Reding a few months ago: "We will maintain cultural
and linguistic diversity, but we need a strong European government and a
European Parliament with a different structure - possibly a bicameral one.
Maybe it would be good to have a Parliament elected by referendum and a Chamber
of Countries in which each state is represented equally. The European Head of Government
would be directly elected by the people’s representatives. This would be the
parliamentary democracy we need in Europe".
Compared with the U.S. federal system, European leaders are chosen mostly "behind closed doors". There should be a greater concern for what kind of leadership the EU needs? What kind of mechanism gets them elected? In a similar line of thought Barroso added: "We must recognize that debates take place primarily between the national parties, but we must enhance the role of European parties to strengthen pan-European debate”. A reaction from European Socialist leader Sergey Stanishev came quickly: "We wonder what Mr Barroso’s Party, the EPP, does in this respect? Only the Party of European Socialists has a real debate and a timetable for choosing the left candidate for the presidency of the European Commission".
Brussels is a
complicated environment and Romania
does not do anything to make this picture clearer. I think that the Constitution
will need to be amended, whether we want it or not, in order to solve all the
problems of ambiguity with which we met during these years. For example, who
participates in the European Council? Is European policy competence considered
domestic or foreign policy? Only after the national Romanian elections in
December 2012 and then 2013 is the best time to evoke a debate and to revise
the Constitution.
To be honest, Romania lacks a
management of the EU policies. Romania needs to 'melt' with what is happening
in the EU, as there are certain values developed European philosophy to which Romania
must comply.
European funds are closely linked
to the performance of Romania
in EU. For connecting the country to the EU we need about 5,000 Romanians in Brussels and 25,000 people in Romania actually involved in the
Community Mechanism. It needs a new program, such as "Expert for a
European Romania". It is clear that time does not lead to solving the current
systemic inertia that Romania
has with the European Union. We must intervene quickly and deeply to correct the
current trends.
Dan LUCA / Brussels
Niciun comentariu:
Trimiteți un comentariu