Are we playing
with fire and do we hate the European Union like it is not ours? Do we really not
want to have this community structure any longer?
I am positive and I believe in the
European construction, but I must bring you bad news this time. We may not have a European Union in five years... You can
say that is not possible... But who thought five years ago that Brexit would
happen or Donald Trump?
The hypothesis
of a possible EU disaster can be demonstrated. The
simplicity of this theory scares us. Let’s look at it mathematically...
Between 23-26 May 2019 elections are
held for the European Parliament. Practically, in 27 countries, simultaneous
elections are held to designate MEPs for the next 5 years. The European level
has very little influence and decision power. I remember the year 2009 when I was on the electoral
list, and on the evening after the elections we gathered the results with the
PES President, Poul Nyrup Rasmussen, to see what the Left did. We noticed that
the EPP won... and then again imposed Barroso as President of the European
Commission.
We risk having
an anti-European movement in the next European Parliament. Everything will
begin on May 26, 2019, when in some countries, like Poland or Hungary, maybe
even Italy, anti-European forces (with inter-governmentalists together) will
send an anti-European majority of MEPs to Brussels and Strasbourg. From
other countries, the EU will have anti-European MEPs, but not the majority. We
pull the line and get to something like 52% pro-Europeans. We say we have won and continue the European dance
calmly.
But there will
be planned or spontaneous backstage movements. Some MEPs will suddenly change their
membership of a group and even a doctrine. For various reasons: they do not like
the leader of their party in the country, they are no longer favorites for the
re-election, or they want to be against the system, it's the cool power... Some
examples are useful: Monica Macovei joined the Parliament in 2014 on the EPP
list and is now at ECR, those responsible for Brexit. Another example, even
louder: Laurenţiu Rebega - brought by the Left in Parliament, visibly clinging with
the French National Front...
Yes, you
realize that the fragile majority of pro-Europeans can erode in the 2-3 years
after the 2019 elections, without any further elections... There is a
possibility that the year 2022 will be the year of crossroads... With a
European Parliament formed by the majority (even at the limit) of the
anti-European, everything will be blocked... the European engine will die...
definitively, unfortunately.
What can be done? The desire to
criticize the EU constructively leads to disaster. Let me give you an example.
Green NGOs engage in an agonizing struggle to raise environmental legislation.
Let's say they fight for 40% and end up at just 30%. NGOs will say "The EU is not ambitious," so
a negative message that catches fantastic media and gets to the ordinary citizen
(often disoriented by the EU) transformed into the signal "EU does
nothing". And the man on the street votes for a populist, anti-European
party on May 26, 2019... And after the electoral disaster, without the EU, we
will not even have 30%... than everything has collapsed. What
are we doing? The dilemma is big... Are we criticizing and destroying
everything? Should we change
the approach?
The problem is
that we criticize a European project that no-one really defends... as somebody
said the story of the war does not catch up with the younger generation, and
the confidence in politicians is not too high. In addition, we now have the
notorious sarcasm of the Anglo-Saxons, encouraged by Brexit and Trump... The
micro jokes fuel a disaster on the macro level...
I almost forgot...
The EU also has external enemies, not just domestic... Russia, Trump/ America, and
I let you decide about China... or Britain even??
What to do?
Some suggestions, like a citizen...
Ø
We
need a clear European project. The momentum in 2019 is beneficial. What kind of
European Union do we want in 2040? Borders, Security, Migration, Euro budget,
Economy, Trade, Institutions... Vision and reality, not bureaucracy and
closure... Positive, inclusive, responsible messages...
Ø
The
EU is diverse, so we need a management of this diversity. Vote by majority in
the Council, without north-south or east-west conflict.
Ø
Credible
leaders with the power to move the European project forward. The Merkel-Macron axe
is not bad, but we need to strengthen it. As was the Kohl-Mitterrand machine in
1991.
Ø
Quickly
treat image issues (symbolic at many times) from Brussels. I do not think the
Selmayr file is helping the European project. I do not speak legally, but
ethically. If we lose 1% of pro-Europeans because of this, the risk is huge...
Ø
Penalizing
the double message, especially for MEPs. A few hundred of them will enter the
electoral campaign and explain their impotence due to Brussels bureaucracy...
Really?
Ø
We
will have about 10,000 candidates for the future European Parliament. How can
we know what they really think about the EU? The electorate needs to know...
Ø
Philosophers,
opinion leaders, experts from the 27 European countries - is the European
project so bad? Choose between yes or no ... it's hard!
Ø
What
role can the 100,000 citizens from euro-Brussels play? Many are now involved in
local politics in the neighborhood where they live (Belgian local elections)...
It is good, but they have much greater potential, especially at a time of
crisis...
Ø
To
the
3,000 industrial federations I strongly recommend that they also
communicate their European vision through the 2019 Manifest or another campaign
document. Design strong arguments for the EU and communicate them from the
beginning of 2019. It will help you with the new Parliament and it will help
the EU too!
Ø
In
a few days the congresses
of the European parties begin. Will we have a discussion focused on
"winning the EU" or "winning the doctrine"? Can we combine?
The list stays
open... but we have to hurry...
Dan LUCA / Brussels
Dan LUCA / Brussels
Niciun comentariu:
Trimiteți un comentariu